Showing posts with label Case Western. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Case Western. Show all posts

Thursday, November 29, 2012

Evening News Wrap

By Keith Edmund White, Editor-in-Chief

So, yes, this is a gross simplification of a BIG BIG week in news.  But we got news at the belly-aches in both nations' legal professions, tax-carping, election-updates, trade, top Canadian fiction, and more!

Canada-U.S. News

Life, death, and taxes…and Extraterritorial Application of U.S. Law in Canada.  Canada and the United States are in tax treaty talks, and it seems like Canadian banks are going to have to deal with the administrative burden of checking if their clients are dual citizens.  The lurking issue: dual citizens in Canada avoiding U.S. taxes.

Canada’s Late Entry to the TPP…Not a Huge Worry, But There’s Still Reason to Worry.  While slamming subsidies U.S. states use to lure companies, and how they hurt Canadian merchants, Peter Clark—in this detailed review of the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade talks, it’s impact on Canada, and the global economy—says (1) Canada doesn’t have much to fear with it’s late arrival to the TPP and (2) concludes:
“It’s far too early to either dismiss TPP as a useless exercise or embrace it as a cure for what ails the global economy. While we see problems now, they can be fixed, with flexibility and compromise. If the TPP is a wine, it clearly needs some ageing before we can properly pass verdict on it quality.”
Canada News

Bye, Bye By-Elections!  Mark Abley, at The Gazette, talks on Monday’s by-elections in Canada, arguing that while Canada’s Conservative lost ground, a united Left is the only way to see a change in Ottawa.  Monday’s by-election results in brief: Conservatives held on to seats in Calgary-Centre and Durham, with a NDP-Green battle in Victoria going the NDP’s ways.

CETA Imbalance?  So What?  Paul Wells, taking note of imbalance concerns regarding Canada-EU trade talks, defends progress on the deal.  And at the National Post, Andrew Coyne gives his thoughts on the “logic of trade negotiations” in general:  “The whole situation is an absurdity.  It’s like a hostage negotiation in which both sides have guns to their own head.”

Moving Out:  Financial Post on the rough road ahead for Bank of Canada governor Mark Carney’s coming move to England; and the Globe and Mail on the importance of vetting cabinet officials and the resignation of Quebec’s environmental minister Daniel Breton. Added-Bonus:  Stephen Gordon at Macleans  on how much credit Carney should get from Canada’s robust post-financial crisis economic performance:
“What I take away from this is that we could have done much worse, but I don’t think we could have done much better. Stephen Harper and Mark Carney were dealt good hands and they played them well.”
Must-Read List.  The Globe and Mail picks the top 23 Canadian fiction books of the year.

Legal News

Going to (U.S.) Law School Worth It!  Lawrence E. Mitchell, Dean at the Case Western University School of Law, defends going to law school in the NYTimes:  
"We could do things better, and every law school with which I’m familiar is looking to address its problems. In the meantime, the one-sided analysis is inflicting significant damage, not only on law schools but also on a society that may well soon find itself bereft of its best and brightest lawyers."
Canada’s Lawyers in Crisis?  The Globe and Mail reports on the state of Ontario’s legal profession: “…it was clear that some of the country’s top legal minds believe their profession is, in effect broken.”

Saturday, February 25, 2012

Niagara International Moot Court Competition Takes D.C. By Storm

Dear Readers,

Sorry for our recent pause from posting.  But the Niagara International Moot Court competition, being held in Washington, D.C., has stolen the attention of the blog's staff this week.   The competition is sponsored by the Canada United States Law Institute, one of the projects of this rich partnership between Case Western Reserve University and the University of Western Ontario.

Law schools from across the United States and Canada have descended upon the American capital to debate a problem focusing on two critical issues:  (1) when and how nations can invoke self-defense to defend themselves from unconventional threats, and (2) what role does the Responsibility to Protect doctrine play in international law.  This question is particularly relevant as the international community confronts what a UN panel has considered Syrian crimes against humanity against their own citizens.

Tonight we’ll know the team winner, team awards for written memorials, and individual speaking awards.  But, whatever the results, this competition is an incredible learning opportunity for students, and also showcases the important relationship between the United States and Canada.  Special thanks to competition chair (noted arbitration attorney, founder of InvestmentClaims.com, and Columbia Law lecturer) Ian A. Laird, CUSLI board and members who have put on this incredible show, the incredible judges who have spent their Friday and Saturday listening to arguments, and Cox International Law Center director professor Michael Scharf who crafted such a relevant and nuanced problem.

A quick shout-out to the sponsors:  DLA Piper, Fasken Martineau, Baker Hostetler, King & Spalding, Crowell Moring, and the Government of Canada.   

And finally, just look at this esteemed panel of judges for the final rounds:  Former ICTY judge Patricia M. Wald, current Ombudsperson for Security Council 1267 Sanctions Committee Kimberly Prost, and former Co-Prosecutor of the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia Robert Petit Learn more about the competition here.